ICANN is currently considering Associated Domain Checks for registrars when one domain has actionable DNS abuse evidence.
Picture a 300-name portfolio. One name is confirmed in a phishing campaign. Looking at the other 299 could uncover more abuse, but owning them in the same account doesn't make them bad domains.
Would you support the review if each additional domain still needed its own evidence before action?
Picture a 300-name portfolio. One name is confirmed in a phishing campaign. Looking at the other 299 could uncover more abuse, but owning them in the same account doesn't make them bad domains.
Would you support the review if each additional domain still needed its own evidence before action?
